Find a Lawyer

ARSHAD ALI ALIAS ACHHU versus THE STATE

Pakistan Panel Code Section 302 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Evidence was disposed of in the Players phase of the alibi Failure to discuss the defense evidence in the High Court Impact Trial Court decision, the accused sentenced to death And the punishment was retained. The High Court suspect held that the prosecution's witness was not present at the scene of the incident because another person has been told that he had brought the body to the hospital and that the High Court in its decision discussed defense evidence. The prosecution's testimony at the hospital was proved by other prosecutor's witnesses and the same superstitious belief that, therefore, the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses about their presence at this location and to see such an incident. Afterwards, he was not badly impressed by the fact that in the hospital records, any of them was also referred to as Prasu. No suggestion was made regarding whether the deceased was brought to the hospital, which challenged the accuracy of the statements of the prosecution witnesses in the prosecution that he was present on the spot. And saw the incident rather than suggest it. The incident took place in different cases, therefore, the presence of the prosecution witnesses said that there was no difference in the defendant's plea that the accused wanted to prove that he was not credible through superiority. The evidence that the defense witnesses were not valuable to the court, it could not be made on the basis of the remand of the case on technical grounds because the High Court did not discuss it in detail, because it would not be safe to do so. This sim us immigration advocates from Pindi Bhattian lawyer