MUHAMMAD IKRAM versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Definition of Evidence Sentence A two-time incident and a case of sudden provocation in which the time, place and weapon were used during the time of the incident were filed by the prosecution witnesses at the relevant time. The presence of the suspect was suspicious because the two prosecution witnesses were residents of the other village, which was three kilometers away from the scene of the incident and could not establish the cause of their presence on the scene. Both witnesses claimed that they witnessed the incident in light of the lantern. Seen, but neither did lanterns exist in site planning The first inspection report prepared by the fetish officer stated that no lanterns were ever occupied by the police officer during the investigation as set up by the prosecution on the basis of the complainant's sole statement. Could not be proved, it was rightly brought to trial The trial court relied on the evidence, was unable to rely, and as such it was possible that the accused did not pay attention to sentencing the capital charge. Will go The trial court's conviction in the defendant's statement that the defendant had taken the murder of the deceased under provocative provocation to protect his sister's honor during the trial The appeal filed by the accused was properly and firmly supported by the suspects on the basis of suspicion of the presence of both eyewitnesses at the relevant time, under Section 2302 (b), PPC. The defendant's defense plea was not rejected by attracting the provisions of section 2302
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Haveli Kahuta lawyer