MUHAMMAD ALI versus THE STATE
Section 497 (2) Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 95 B95 Guarantee, Grant of Further Inquiry None of the accused person knew the testimony of the first complainant or other prosecutor not before the date of arrest of the accused memo And said there was recovery. The defendant's alleged stolen vehicle in the daily routine did not appear to be based on any credible evidence, although the accused was involved in a large number of criminal cases, but there appears to be no legal action against him in the case. The evidence does not exist. On physical remand with the police, but none of the alleged looted property was recovered; one of the further investigations into the case against the accused is, he was granted bail, allegedly robbed. Cash was recovered from the possession of the suspects along with the traveler's check and some of the suspects; in fact, were associated with the crime;
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer
