MUHAMMAD YAQOOB versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/449 Testimony of Evidence The presence of the complainant who immediately named the accused in the recorded complaint was fully proved that both witnesses' statements were consistent and their testimony was No material contradictions were brought on record to exclude eyewitnesses were not falsely prejudiced Defendants were not reliable on the defendant's version of the testimony stated by the defense witnesses nor were they ever involved in the investigation. Statements have been recorded which prove that he was not an eyewitness to the incident. Tofi lived in the village alone with his family and the accused was also a relative. In the same village where the complainant was a resident of another city, the resident witnesses of the same village, in the circumstances, brought the story after the hearing to help the accused motive, although it was not proven, but in the case of the motive. Absence or weakness was unusual. Nothing was brought to prove that the accused was involved in the previous rivalry between the deceased and the complainant, as there is no reason why the complainant could not have used any of the evidence directly from the witnesses. Does not allow the actual trial of the offender after establishing a case against the accused beyond doubt. Medical evidence cannot be interfered with by the trial court, disputing the original culprit's conviction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Rajanpur lawyer