MUHAMMAD UMAR TARAR versus JUDGE BANKING COURT NO. II, LAHORE
Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Sections 4 and 6 (6) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Processing of the petition application The bank tribunal passed a decree dated 23 11 1992, the judicial lender did not file an appeal against the order until 1993. Of But the Constitutional High Court dismissed the constitutional petition on the ground of judgment in the case of Messrs. Chenab Cement Product (Private) Ltd and others v. Banking Tribunal, Lahore and other PLD 1996 Law 672, with the observation that its The decision will not be affected. After the decisions and orders, which were subsequently finalized, the Bank Tribunal applied for the decree, which affected the objection of the judgment's objection that the ruling was due to the High Court judge's decision. On the one hand, it was further stated that after the appointment of the Presiding Officer, who approved the decree, it was unconstitutional, therefore, the order was void and unable to comply with the bank, Sunri Bank Limited The Supreme Court verdict was referred to in the civil cases of Raja Weaving Mill Limited and another KLR 1997. 2 742, in which the Supreme Court denied relief to the petitioner, who did not challenge the decree passed against it, the High Court dismissed the County for a trial petition as having no power.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
