Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

NAUBAHAR BOTTLING CO. LTD versus CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL


The High Court upheld the Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 114 and O XLVII, R1 High Court, pursuant to the Customs Act 1969 section 196 (I) [as added by the Finance Act (V of 1989)]. Because the Tribunal was without jurisdiction, it observed in its order dated 14.4.1996 that the review filed by the appellant would be considered pending and the decision was taken by the competent authority under section 196. (1) was added to the Customs Act, 1969 by the Finance Act 1989. The application, which began on 30 April 1995, moved pending tribunals with the federal government, who were able to decide, the reason for ignoring such legal provisions before the High Court. Could not be submitted because the High Court accepted the review request and withdrew its order dated 14 ated. 1999, arguing that the appeals were pending and filed before the appropriate High Court Bench.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocate from Daharki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.