Find a Lawyer

LEHRASIB ALIAS RASAB versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/324/337E (i) (c) / 337E (i) (v) / 397/458/460/34 FIR of Definition of Evidence was filed immediately Ocular Evidence Complaint The defendant and the prosecution presented two witnesses who were natural witnesses, and they specifically named the accused and, despite long scrutiny, nothing favorable for the accused could be extracted, with some minor contradictions in the evidence or Contradictions say the witnesses were not enough to end the prosecution's case, the defense version seemed highly unlikely and the defendant failed to present any evidence in support of the said version. What was said was that he was involved in the case because of enmity and doubt but he could not indicate that the complainant had enough evidence with the accused and the circumstances of the audience made it clear. That night, the accused committed crimes at the victim's house after armed himself with deadly weapons. The conviction and motivation of using semi-automatic weapons for evidence of the robbery offered by eye witnesses was convincing, and it was not at all possible that eyewitnesses made any dishonest correction to their statements. The laboratory backed the prosecutor's story The acquisition of the golden ear ring from the suspect's possession was another contributing factor to the prosecution's version, the prosecution said, beyond reasonable doubt that the three defendants offered their common intentions. Had committed a break from home at night, and abused the house of the victim after setting himself on fire with the intention of robbing him in prison for fear of immediate death, law firms from Naudero lawyer