Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ ALI SHAH versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD., H.Q., ISLAMABAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Deprived of a 494 Prosecutor When the charge is withdrawn by the competent authority or by a public prosecutor under Section 494, it will be deemed that the benefit of any doubt from the acquittal Honorable breeze or otherwise it was completely irrational and out of place. The Honorable Brotherhood was a stranger to the Code of Conduct, since 1898, as the terms created by Section 494 did not support the terminology formulated by the CRPC, except in the CRPC. Before the accusation occurred, he was charged and if this happened after the accusation, he would be acquitted. It was as good a crime as it would have been under any other circumstances, but with the dismissal from the prosecution, the prosecution was kept on a better basis because the prosecutor held that there was no possibility of being convicted and that the allegation was baseless. Could not export any results of. A term like orable respected brat was not valid at all and was not provided anywhere in the Criminal Code, 1898. top advocates from Noor kot lawyer