Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS ALIAS KAKA versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 324/337 B / 337 F (iii) Definition of evidence On the basis of misidentification of the alleged ocular evidence presented by the complainant and the injured prosecutor's witness, he participated in the crime. There was no doubt about this, that these witnesses are completely credible, their evidence was sufficient to punish the accused in any way. The serious nature of the injured witness's stomach was established on the spot, and he himself appeared in court to narrate his distress at the hands of the accused. The injured prosecutor's witness had no reason to make false accusations against the accused and was not. The fictitious story of the incident was heard and the evidence of both the complainant and the injured prosecution witness, who were brothers, was credible that their statements were sufficiently explained by both the complainant and the injured prosecution witness. The fact that the evacuation was not reported on the spot and the bullet was not seized by the investigating officer, did not advance the cause of the defense as the injuries were reported. The trial court, in its original context of excluding firearms, strongly defended the evidence in accordance with the basic principles in relation to the definition of evidence; no conclusions could be intervened by the trial court in relation to the sentence, but The accused has been given a maximum sentence. The one that looked harsh, was similarly reduced, the rigorous imprisonment for ten years was reduced to seven years. best law firm from Besham lawyer