Find a Lawyer

MST. SUGHRAN NASEEM versus MST. RIFAT TAHIRA

Sections 2 (10), 8 and 10 of the Punjab Local Government Election Rules, 2000, RR 70 and 71 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition were declared successful by the candidate on the specific seat for the farmers but the election petition candidate. Opposition to challenge was filed by the Election Tribunal allowing the selection of the applicant that the applicant was not a farmer as stated in section 2 (10) of the Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance, 2000. , The applicant claimed to be a farmer on the land that she relies on to cultivate 8 kanals. The Electoral Tribunal had purchased the land through the petitioner a few days before the filing of the nomination. According to these circumstances, the applicant mentioned in Section 2 (10) of the Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance was not a farmer. , 2000 petitioner claimed that even if he was not a farmer, it was not necessary for him to become a farmer himself. It is understood that any woman can contest to represent the farmers and the workers were canceled as section 10 (1) of Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance 2000. The members of a union council were to be selected on the basis of separate voter-based adult voting and separate voter minority voters for the purpose of being elected to any seat mentioned in section 8 of the Punjab Local Government Election Ordinance. Was the reference. , 2000 and certain seats specifically for farmers and workers, except for the minority community, if there was only one request that Pakistan, top advocate family court from Kamra lawyer