Find a Lawyer

MALIK & COMPANY versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK

Financial Institutions (Recovery of Taxes) Ordinance 2001 Section 17 and 22 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 152 Bankers \ Books Proof of Act (XVIII of 1891), Section 4 Decree, 13,18,171 58 under the amendment of the Bank Rs. The defendant filed for leave to attend bankruptcy and defense in court with markup filed for recovery of - Bankers \ Box Aviation Act, 1891 filed full statement of accounts certified under court Which is intended to pass an order in claimant's terms for a fixed sum. In the statement of accounts, but instead of declaring the suit for the actual amount and marking up, the decree was passed at Rs. 5,21,503, which was the only markup amount which was the principal amount of the loan. Ie 9,96,301 was 28 rupees, was not included. The decision of the Banking Court to justify in its terms the markup with the decree sanctioned by Rs. 15,17,804 45 was clear that the decree was in fact only Rs. 5,21,503 in the amount of Rs. Was approved because of The separate amount in which the claims for drunkenness was Rs 13,18,171 was 58, in which the markup High Court amended the anonymous order and Rs 13,18,171 along with its mark. Also deleted the suit order with you. top civil advocates from Haripur lawyer