SHAFQAT MAHMOOD versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE
Sindh Police (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1988 R 6 Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4, Employee dismissed on the basis of registration of criminal case against whom a criminal case was registered He was fired after presenting the cause. Not only without notice but against them, in fact, based on the report of the inquiry committee, there was a fact-finding committee based on the police investigation in which a public servant was not allowed to participate. Such an investigation cannot be considered a regular inquiry. Under the Sindh Police (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules 1988, the government employee was otherwise acquitted by the court of competent jurisdiction, but the authorities neglected the search of the competent court and against the civil servants. A dismissal order was granted against the dependency on the investigation, which was rejected. Appropriate consideration should have been taken while considering the court's decision of the court g. The court order appealed to the government employee's order dismissing the employees who had been approved by the authority, to restore it from the date of dismissal. Was set with the instructions for.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Shujabad lawyer