Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RASHEED versus GHULAM RASUL

The plaintiff's claim for defendant's claim was that the sale agreement allegedly executed in favor of the defendants was fake and forged and that no consideration was given to the defendant. Failed to prove and defendants opposed the claim that the sale agreement was legally executed in their favor. In addition to the agreement of the two other vendors with the claimant, the terms and conditions of the sale of the land in question were very much on the record, consisting of the signatures of the three vendors and a witness, but all the signatures of the contract other than the plaintiff. Died in the courts only after the time expired. Particularly in civil leases, such a situation was encountered as they went through probabilities and if there is a possibility of any reasonable possibility or absence of relevant fact, then the matter can be decided on probability and such. Probability itself proves the truth. If it is established in the case that since the implementation of the treaty in question, the D occupants had been in possession of the land in dispute, they had paid the full price of the land in installments and were receiving the land revenue from it. Such an attitude of the parties could have led a sensible man to the assumption that a contract was made, and it was done. Defendants, in the circumstances, rejected the statement of truth, and, in those circumstances, it cannot be said that the courts were reading the wrong evidence or failed to read the evidence on the record, below. Interfere with the conclusions of the courts attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kohistan lawyer