MUJEEB-UR-REHMAN HASHMI versus THE INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, SINDH
Police Rules 1934 R12 21 The Sindh Service Tribunals Act (XV of 1973), Section 4 of the Service Installation of Intelligence of Financial Emoluments, appointed a police employee as a police constable during the intervention period, leaving the employee nearly two years behind him. Retired from service after taking action against RR. Police Rules, 21 of 1934 A civil servant has filed a mercy petition for restoration and administration after retiring for more than 9 years, the mercy request was accepted after inquiries and reinstated government employees. Soon after the rehabilitation, a government employee applied for payment of financial data for the intervening period in which he stayed away from the job whose application was rejected and the public servant employed for a three-year term. The application was rejected before the termination of employment. The relevant authority was pointed out by the civil service ant and even this authority was not made a party to the appeal which was the basis for establishing the discharge orders, as well as the government employee's charges against the civil servant. It was accepted by government employees and it was unreliable that a civil servant was just sitting at home and doing nothing to earn his bread and butter for a long period of nine years. Was not available for duty, not entitled to the money, as their claimants claim.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Tank lawyer