Find a Lawyer

CIROS ENTERPRISES, RAWALPINDI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 50 (4) Sales Tax Act, 1990, Section 3A Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXV of 2000), Section 9 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 23 CBR Letter C No. 1 (74) WHT / 2000, dated 16 4 2001 Complaints through sales tax deduction Federal tax Ombudsman The buyer / supplier / buyer received the Income Tax under section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. According to the directive of Letter C-NL (74) WHT / 2000, the complainant was compensated by the sales tax on the basis of the validity withholding tax dated 16-4 2001 under CBR and CBR. The deductible was deducted from the bills payable to the complainant / reviewer. Payment of receipt of income tax on payment by the recipient of the supply, in the present case, includes sales tax and the complainant / supplier was trusting the arrangement with the buyer but no such contract or contract was contracted. can do. Violation of the law was void and unenforceable. The complainant was unable to submit a notification under Section 3A of the Sales Act 1990 in support of the complainant's case, thus having no competence. Neither the administration nor the Revenue Division's complaints were dismissed by the Federal Tax Ombudsman. top advocates from Mangi lawyer