Find a Lawyer

ARSHI CARPETS versus SECRETARY REVENUE, DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Formation of Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 13 (1) (b) and 156 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (Office of Offense XV of 2000), Section 9 In addition to the Department's utility error and appellate tribunal bench effect facts. Application for Prevention Income Tax Ordinance 1979 1979 1979 The complainant / assessee suffered inconvenience due to inaction on this application which was filed by the Assessing Officer under Section 13 (1) (b) of the Income Tax Act. It was the personal administration who approved the arbitration order on the issue of the increase. The Tax Ordinance, 1979, affirming that the petitioner (judicial) under section 156 is present before the appellate authority before the CBR on this matter is affirmed that under section 150. The SC request has been decided. In their favor, according to the provisions of Section 156 (3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, the recommendation of the Federal Tax Ombudsman asserts that the Complainant / Reviewer is the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal under Section 156 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Can pass a Miscellaneous Request that has been entered into its Order for identification of errors and related facts preventing them from being Bench by a representative of the Department. And that the relevant Regional Commissioner of Income Tax should inquire as to what the Commissioner of Income Tax and the officers under them acted on their instruction, why the Remand Report was not submitted to the Income Tax. Appellate Tribunal; Identifying Officers Responsible for Inactivity and Proposing Action Against Responsible Officers jobs for fresh advocates from Jehangira lawyer