Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus MUHAMMAD YAHYA

Sections 4 and 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O XX, R 14 and O XLI, Rr 1, 5 Presentation suit Trial Court dismisses a case instructing the umpire to collect the sale price by 10 197 1977, Will prove to be a failure. The promoter filed an appeal against the determination of the sale price on March 8, 1977, but did not file a copy of the decision / decree of the trial court appellate court by interim order, instructing the pre-emptor on 9 d 10 1977. That he / she should file a Decision / Declaration on 23 /. 10 7 1977 and the appeal was eventually dismissed after the order of the appellate court suspended. The correct appellate court can only transmit a copy of the decision, but the appeal of the trial court's order was not properly formed on the court date. In the legal part of the appeal in violation of O XLI, R 1, the CPC Appellate Court upheld the trial court's order on a date when no reasonable action had been taken before it. The order, dated 9 10 1977, was invalid, in the absence of a legal order restraining order, the trial court's decree shall be enforced from 10 10 197 1977 and the case will be dismissed with costs, before the umpire. The date set for submission by the trial court was allowed. The sale price for the termination, which resulted in his dismissal famous high court advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer