Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR ALI versus THE STATE

Sections 497 (1), First Proviso Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 299 (a), 302, 306 and 308 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 2 (b), 10 (7) (a) (b) and 12 (a) in guaranteeing the accused on the basis of age, it was claimed that he was a child in the meaning of Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000 at the time of the criminal commission, the death sentence. Can't be It should be honored and instead of the clutch (A) of section 10 (a) of section 10 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000, the CL (B) stated that it would apply to the issue which was expressly contradictory. But nothing can be said. On the one hand, under the Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, the death penalty for a child was expressly banned / excluded, while this condition was made under section 10 (7) (a) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance 2000. That the child has to face. In the death penalty case, the exemption may be allowed only if the accused was detained for more than a year's subrogation (7) of section 10 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, relating to the offense in which the death sentence was imposed. And no accused can be prosecuted. pakistani advocates Kotla Pathan lawyer