Find a Lawyer

FIDA HUSSAIN versus GHULAM SARWAR

Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 12 (2) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 181 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art, 185 (3) Decree of consent, keeping aside the prediction of fraud and misrepresentation. Limitation Approval The computing period was passed on Order 4 11 1980 and the trial court ruled that this decree 219 1982 allegedly and allegedly applied under section 12 (2). This decree was not known or the Title Dead applicants did not know. 3 10 The trial court on 1986 dismissed the petition but the appellate court overturned the trial court's finding and allowed the High Court to restore the jurisdiction under Article 199 of the constitution. It was held that while this decree was not a title dyad, therefore, the trial court did not reject the right under the jurisdiction to claim in favor of filing an application for setting aside this decision at the time of the enactment of the decree. The consent states that it was not implemented on the date of its announcement or the date of its execution and provided only that the decree was not considered a contract of sale. But there is no restriction on the condition that the possession of the suit property made on behalf of the holder of the declaration of the property on the basis of the oral contract was also ineffective and would be effective for sale. Article of the Limitation Act, 1908 The three-year period under 181 under will start from the date when the right is to file a case which was submitted in the present case in 21982 when the applicant. Upon hearing the order, the trial court correctly found that 3 198 1 online advocate from Sambrial lawyer