Find a Lawyer

MST. AYESHA BIBI versus MST. RASHIDA BEGUM

Section 10 and 11 of the Pakistan (Administration of Evacuee Property) Act (XII of 1957), Section 3, 22 and 41 state of the available property in compensation pool as an industrial unit before transfer of agricultural land to RL II as a transfer of industrial unit. Unit and the same was purchased by the father of the plaintiff Video Sailing Dad, which was registered before the date fixed under the Pakistan (Administrative Equity Property) Act, 1957, and then registered by his father in favor of him. The property was transferred under the name. The plaintiff claimed to own the suit property allotted as agricultural land on the basis of RL II. Both the courts have decided in this case in favor of the plaintiff in which the industrial concern, if it is vacated in the therapeutic treatment and brought into the pool of legal compensation, was to be disposed of. The Homeowners' Compensation (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958, was explained in detail by Odeon considered the eviction of the suit property, or for that matter, the rehabilitation authorities ordered the transfer of the land in favor of the defendant through agricultural land. As it could never be moved because at any time before this suit property was never considered vacant. He used to go OR After 1 1957, namely the date fixed in Pakistan (Administration for Equity Property) Act, 1957, the exchange order was invalid in favor of the defendant, the suit property could not be transferred to the displaced persons (compensation and Restoration) Act (XXVIII of 1958) The High Court refuses to interfere with the decisions and orders passed by the courts. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Sara e Naurang lawyer