Find a Lawyer

M. IFTIKHAR & COMPANY (PVT.) LTD. versus PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS LTD.

Section 14, 17, 30 and 33 of the Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5, 14 (2) and Article 158 of the Sindh Chief Court Rules (O section), RR 280 and 282 (1) Objection to the award, limitation Objection to the non-filing of a copy of the award by arbitration of non-filing of arbitration, with notice under section 14 (2) of the Arbitration Act 1940 with the award received notice of the award dated 23 12 1997, 21 1 1998 Respondents filed a lawyer's wisdom on 27 1 1998 with the respondents. 28 1 1998 Application was made for certified copy of the award, which they received on 13 2 1998, Respondents' arguments were filed on 3 9 1998, to exclude only then to obtain a certified copy. Therefore, the time provided under Article 158 of the Limitation Act, 1908, runs from 13 2 1998 and the award entry notice was a copy of the award accuracy not available from the date of service as available with the respondents. The statement states that Witt is affiliated with his request that respondents could have obtained a certified copy of the award, if they had not been available, had accepted the certified copy of the award. The objections were out of bounds because the award entry notice was submitted on 21 st 1998 and at the time of filing, the limitation of the objections related to the award had expired on section 5 of the Act, 1908, as applicable. , The time could not be extended, the award was being filed properly, it should be viewed on the merit itself, the court did not accept the objection to the award as a matter of time. Prohibited advocates from Mandra lawyer