MAJ.(RETD.) TARIQ MEHMOOD versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 109 and 120B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 164 Identification of retroactive judicial confession Judicial confession on conviction The Confession Principle Proves that if the court was convinced that the confession was voluntary and truthful, even if denied, the principle in charge of the capital might be sufficient to maintain the sentence on the rule, however, demand. That the confessional statement be substantiated by other evidence. Judicial confession of the accused directly or, in the material details, in the present case, after having sufficiently qualified the evidence of the motive, positive report of the medical and firearms expert on the bullet recovered from the deceased's body, Was found to be true, voluntary and trustworthy where a confessional statement of the accused was recorded by a judicial magistrate, who stated that the complainant had recorded his confessional statement, complaining of any compulsion, torture or greed with anyone. Was not registered, the accused sent to the relevant session judge the next day of making a confessional statement Services, in the absence of any sign of external pressure. Confirming the theory of evidence taken by the High Court, the confession recorded in the Supreme Court will not have any effect on the conviction and the conviction and sentence imposed on the accused has been retained and the leave application for appeal has been dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer