Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 65, 111 and 136 Referring to the Facts Question Re-imposing Fines The question of fact Forced to dispute The filing reference was that this review incorrectly obtained its income from the Poultry Farm Revenue Authority. Was declared. The basis of the report of a revenue official did not accept the income as announced by the assessee and the case was reopened under section 65 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, which did not raise any legal disputes as a framework. Which will be answered by a High Court question. A reviewer obtained from a particular business during a particular assessment period was a purely factual question and had not raised any legal disputes before merely being asked about the question of tribunal law. The report of the revenue-earning official was never going to be the turning point. When it was either properly raised and ruled by the Tribunal or otherwise it was born as a natural consequence of the Tribunal ruling where neither of the two terms were available. Would refuse to interpret the question as "the presence of any information that would justify reopening the diagnosis was an important question of fact, and therefore could not be a topic." Reference was answered in the negative way under section 136 (2) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
