Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD LATIF versus REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD


Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 62, 138 and 63 Evaluation of Arbitration Arbitration Net income was estimated on the basis of the past history of the case and a slight progressive increase in business. There was no past history and no scrutiny. In order to find out if anything was inquired to ascertain the expansion of business volume, no basis order was approved by the sed assessing officer, disallowed and the revenue estimate was too high where the section At the time the previous Part was passed under the Assessment Order was to be passed with justice. The Federal Tax Ombudsman, 1979 of the Income Tax Ordinance, recommends that the Commissioner of Income Tax return the order of the officer in his jurisdiction under section 138 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 and allow relief on the liability.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Matli lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.