Find a Lawyer

ASHIQ HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

The delay in filing the Pakistan Penal Code Section 302/460/34 FIR, in which the accused son and widow were declared prisoners, was a natural witness to the incident, leaving the actual culprits guilty of any false execution. There was no reason for the prosecutor's testimony to stand the cross-examination for a long time, but his testimony was not corrupted and he proved to be a truthful and trustworthy witness because no material was brought on record to deny his testimony. , The ocular account presented by both witnesses was completely inconsistent with the medical evidence. The recovery of the weapons of the offense cannot be interfered with if the accused is found guilty, in which case the weapons of the offense by the accused were in the ordinary seventies and it was not specifically stated whether the fatal injury or In the absence of purpose or weakness there was no basis for less punishment, but in the present case the complainant had everything to do with the fact that there was some dispute between the victim and the accused about 4/4 months ago. It was requested that there was some dispute between the parties over the claim of handing over the girl to the marriage that some important facts were given by the parties. Eq was concealed and immediately before what happened, it was unclear the High Court, for the management of criminal justice, sentenced the death sentence to life imprisonment. online advocate from Balakot lawyer