Find a Lawyer

SAADULLAH JAN versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 Appreciation of evidence The accused remained in police custody for 5 days after his arrest. The magistrate who recorded the confessional statement of the accused admitted that he did not reveal his identity to the accused. It is likely that the magistrate raised the question. About the period of detention, or whether he disclosed his identity to the accused magistrate, he did not assure that he would not be detained in police custody if the accused did not commit a confession, to protect the administration of justice. Therefore, the confessional statement was refused to consider the prosecution's testimony. The victim's brothers were, but mere relations were not enough to ruin their testimony because there would be no previous rivalry or wrongful bloodshed between the accused and such witnesses to reveal false accusations of murder against the accused. ? The earlier version of the report and its version cannot be broken. The cross-examination and other prosecutor's testimony confirmed his testimony on all material aspects and no harmful material was revealed during the cross-examination. patent advocate from Peshawar lawyer