Find a Lawyer

UMAR DRAZ versus THE STATE

Articles 23 and 27 of the Drugs Act 1976 Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) accused of confiscating drugs from the shop of the accused, whose misuse, unregistered and without warranty, confessed to his trial before the trial court. And their statements were also recorded in the case. The court took action to convict the accused / accused and sentenced them in accordance with the law, neither the accused nor the lawyer at the hearing. The Central Appeal and the High Court appeared, after hearing the law officer, dismissed the appeal to convict and maintain the conviction. In this case, the trial court had already shown gentleness in the case, the High Court verdict was reasonable and it did not face any legal or factual weakness, there was no specific question of law. Public interest in the case involved leave applications for appeal against the High Court decision were dismissed in the circumstances advocates from Badin lawyer