Find a Lawyer

MST. SARDARAN versus ALLAH DITTA

Section 42 of the Punjab Tenancy Act (XVI of 1887), Sections 5, 10 and 114 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), the section 42 declaration case for occupancy tenancy, evidence of the land owned by the plaintiff and the defendants. By way of mortgage, it was eventually redeemed by the claimant. On the return of the land, the defendants somehow introduced themselves as occupant tenants in relation to the land they were renting, and the revenue record was changed in such a way that the plaintiff challenged the civil court. That this effect was declared illegal. Admission to the Revenue Record of occupancy tenancy was illegal, the trial court dismissed the trial, but the appellate court overturned the trial court's findings against which the plaintiff filed a review petition, the plaintiff filed a revenue record. I was shown to the plaintiff in possession of the suit land and the defendant's father was shown. The defendant, as the hen on the suit land as the tenant, was subsequently declared as owner and P in the disputed mutation The plaintiff was shown possession of the land before the plaintiff's approval of the disputed change. No opportunity was given, and no report was given in the Daily Waketty which was necessary, before any correction of the changes could be made to confirm any mutation in violation of the essential provisions of the Land Records Act. Is not retained and was liable to be set aside if the defendant was a tenant under the claimant before the mortgage, then on the formation of the mortgage, when the tenant was not present as the defendant, then the defendant was not the occupying tenant. They were, still, occupied immigration advocates phone number from Shadiwal lawyer