Find a Lawyer

SHEIKH ABDUL HAMEED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 3, 25 (1) and 35 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of Office (XXV of 2000), Sections 2 (3) (i), 9 (1) and 11 Issue / Complainant note on the first page of their return Provided that not all of his assets were taxable because the matter was attached by the High Court in favor of the Bank Assistant Commissioner Income Tax / Wealth Tax, which, during the course of the investigation, was made by the complainant through various letters. Completed the Wealth Tax review, ignoring Was filed under section 35 of the Wealth Tax Act, 1963. The complainant's position was that the authority did not bother to consider the court's decree, which is the conclusive evidence of his submissions that his net worth is void because he owes a large number of responsibilities. That the Assessing Authority had fulfilled all legal requirements before completing such a review Legal requirements not only indicate the issuance and service of certain notices and all documents and evidence submitted by the complainant legally. Was responsible for making all the letters sent to the Assessment Authority before the completion of the review were an integral part of the Wealth Tax Return Assessing Officer, failing to take notice of the important note on the first page of this page of return and various court orders. It was important to consider / discuss the assessment orders on the decisions that were made in the evaluation order. In the works it is important to clarify whether the responsibilities are allowed or not. And the complainant's submissions that the assessment orders were unfair and unwarranted by such defects. law firms from Shahdad Kot lawyer