MUHAMMAD AFZAL BAJWA versus DIRECTOR GENERAL EXCISE AND TAXATION, PUNJAB, LAHORE
Punjab Civil Servants (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 4 (a) (iii), (b) (ii) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Service Employee Compulsory Retirement In Excise and Taxation Department Was the inspector. He was accused of collecting poor taxes and was initially fined withholding an increment, but after a month and a half he was mandated to retire, but the authority could not provide a satisfactory / plausible explanation as to why. After a minor fine, the case was reopened after a month and a half, yet neither the competent officer recommended a major fine nor was there any show cause notice issued to the civil servant or not. He was given the opportunity to hear a public employee's data / recovery. Had shown that he was not behind his peers in the recovery of arrears and that the present tax authority did not claim that the public servant had made a false statement about the recovery and that the case of the public servant was better than the affairs of the co-public servants. On a strong basis, he was tried for the same charge, but his appeals were accepted, the public servant never commented negatively during his thirty-six years of service. In the absence of any reasonable basis for imposing any penalty on the civil servant, the penalty imposed was set aside.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
