Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL BAJWA versus DIRECTOR GENERAL EXCISE AND TAXATION, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Punjab Civil Servants (Eligibility and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 4 (a) (iii), (b) (ii) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Service Employee Compulsory Retirement In Excise and Taxation Department Was the inspector. He was accused of collecting poor taxes and was initially fined withholding an increment, but after a month and a half he was mandated to retire, but the authority could not provide a satisfactory / plausible explanation as to why. After a minor fine, the case was reopened after a month and a half, yet neither the competent officer recommended a major fine nor was there any show cause notice issued to the civil servant or not. He was given the opportunity to hear a public employee's data / recovery. Had shown that he was not behind his peers in the recovery of arrears and that the present tax authority did not claim that the public servant had made a false statement about the recovery and that the case of the public servant was better than the affairs of the co-public servants. On a strong basis, he was tried for the same charge, but his appeals were accepted, the public servant never commented negatively during his thirty-six years of service. In the absence of any reasonable basis for imposing any penalty on the civil servant, the penalty imposed was set aside. lawer from fb area from Kalar Syedian lawyer