Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMAD versus MST. SALAMAT BIBI

Specific Relief Act 1877 Sections 42 and 54 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) claiming a permanent and permanent injunction claiming to be the whole of the victim Is entitled to inherit the property. Legal heirs / brothers have been challenged to replace the inherited legacy in favor of the defendants as daughters of the victims, and the defendants allege that the defendant's mother's marriage to a GM MD was accompanied by a son, who died in India. Before partition India and the defendants were born in India. And then the plaintiff, brother-in-law's second married (deceased) designated son, MD Son of ID Trial Court, dismissed the suit, dismissing the suit, which the decision in the High Court reviewed. Court affirmed, Plaintiff could not prove that defendant GM's sons were daughters of MD son with whom his mother had married in India, both the courts below gave great weight to the defendants. - This evidence is more relevant than the evidence of the plaintiff and he correctly found the accused to be found. The daughters of the appellant appellate court correctly appreciated and relied on the testimony of witnesses from the two defendants, where the defendants were married - marriages with ID's son's MD and ID cards. Record copies of were kept. They were the daughters of the MD (the plaintiff's brother), and the marriage copy was prepared so that they did not need the witnesses' testimony to prove them. \ C online advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer