Find a Lawyer

FAZAL HAMEED versus MUHAMMAD FAYAZ KHAN

Section 5 Delay Delegation Powers The statute of limitations jurisdiction will be strictly considered as it was intended to help with vigilance and not defeat by an unquestionably delayed equity whose court has always sought its aid Where a party slept with her help. Every day has to explain the rights and achievements of the delay. The court had the discretion to delay it only after satisfying itself that there was a reason for the delay. You should use his guidance in obedience. The point was to engage in a case while acting at its discretion would be duty bound to uphold the principles of equity and fairness in a judicial manner.

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013

• LUQMAN alias PEHLAWAN v. DAUD 2013 YLR 381
• MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH v. The STATE through Abdul Qudus 2013 MLD 395
• Qazi FAISAL WAJID v. MUNIR ULLAH KHAN 2013 PCrLJ 400
• FAZAL ILLAHI BACHA v. JAWAD ALI 2013 MLD 402
• GUL BACHA v. State 2013 YLR 404
• ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR INTELLIGENCE AND INVESTIGATION, PESHAWAR v. KHALIL MUHAMMAD 2013 PTD 407
• MUHAMMAD MAROOF KHAN v. SIRAJ-UL-ARIFEEN 2013 MLD 410
• MUHAMMAD AZIZ v. PIR GUL BADSHAH 2013 CLC 411

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2013 →

best law firms from Mustang lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes