Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR AHMAD versus MEHRBAN

Section Q Qun Qanun Martyrdom (of 1984 of (Ka 10), Arts 17 (2) and 61 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3)) The trial plaintiff has been sued by his father On the basis of the registered cell debt executed by the father of the accused has been executed on the basis of which the trial court upheld the suit and rejected the order, which dismissed the case. The judgment was upheld by the High Court in review. The implementation of the Geely Registered Cell Deed was implemented on 17 19 1963, while the plaintiffs sued on 17 June 1984 for such negligence. Event The sale went on for 20 years to link Holiness to the sale process The respondents' possession of the disputed land confirmed the authenticity of the registered sale deed, therefore, not to examine its witnesses The fatal plaintiff was not \ The witness admitted that it appears that the impression of the thumb on the sale work seems to be that of his father, the plaintiff cannot report mileage from the expert's report because of his father's thumb mark. He posted the Split Power of Attorney sent to a finger specialist to compare the impression of his thumb on a sales contract. Had there been no concrete example of misinterpretation or proof reading by the plaintiffs, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal and refused leave of appeal. pakistani advocates Qasba Gujrat lawyer