Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH SHAH versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (1) and 103 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 and 25 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Bail, Grant of the accused Directly named in the FIR, an offense punishable under the prohibition clause of section 4949 had been arrested on the spot and license pistol without the same bore and cart of the same bore. In addition to the cartridges, large quantities of chars and heroin were recovered from his possession. A recovery memo was prepared on the occasion, which was formally testified by police officers, that the grounds were not available to the ground PC suspects for the non-compliance of the formal procedures of the CRPC and the section 103, There was no doubt in recovery for such compliance as CRPC supplies. There was no application to control drug cases under which the application of Section 103 CCPC was removed under the provisions contained in section 25 of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997, even as other It was not required that the testimony of the public should be presented in every case, as it depends on the fact of each case. The police officers were good witnesses as long as no one was accused of enmity with the people. Have sued them. The allegation of denial of the bail of the accused properly used by the court below is sufficient to prove that the accused was connected to the discretion of the first-party accused, dismissing the petition filed by the accused. Go female advocates from Attock lawyer