Find a Lawyer

BASHIR AHMED versus MEMBER (JUDICIAL-III). BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Sections 36, 161 and 164 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R17 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1991 Constitutional Appeal to the High Court Headman (Limberdar), Appointment of Applicant Appointed Collector As the appeal was dismissed on the ground that he was illiterate and failed to submit the land revenue, the warrant for his arrest was issued by the Board of Revenue on the basis of the defendant's review Accepted the petitioner's request that while applying for appointment as a limber holder, the High Court dismissed the constitutional petition filed by the applicant. Or was. The applicant stated that in view of the guidelines for the appointment of a lumberman, which was specified in the R17 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, he is an educated person who owns a lot of land. Relatively the respondents had an edge, which was not only illiterate, but also a disincentive at the time of filing an application. He was no stranger to the crucial stage because there was nothing in the record to support such controversy as the education dispute was misunderstood because the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules 1968 R17 was silent on the subject. The respondent was preferred over the applicant. Mainly because he worked for the satisfaction of the resigned officials for 14 years as a temporary lumberman. The relevant court dismissed the petition and refused to allow the appeal. inheritance advocates near Dera Ghazi Khan lawyer