SHAH MUHAMMAD versus MANZOOR AHMAD
Before the trial of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Sections 4 and 21 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908) Section 115, OVII, R 11, the case was resisted against the dismissal of the defendant. As time is restricted and the claimant is entitled to a rejection. In appealing to the clauses of O VII, R 11, the CP, CPC plaintiff showed that his case was far-reaching and that it was a mixed question of limitation and law and facts. Must do. On the evidence that can be presented only after the cases have been presented, the appellate court set aside the trial court's order under which the plaintiff was dismissed. The appellate court ruled after considering the matter in its original context and did not have any material irregularities and illegal proceedings which could lead to high interference. The court in its review jurisdiction
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Muzaffarabad lawyer
