In section 302 (b) of the Conan testimony (10 of 1984), the value of the clause doubt The benefit of the doubt was not the child witness trial court, while recording the statement of the child's witness, who was the daughter of both the victim and the accused. To determine the child's ability to testify to his questions in compliance with Article 3 of the Martyrdom of the Law, 1984. The child's witness, in her cross-examination, had completely denied her presence with her father / suspect at the time of making the report. The hospital Daily Diary falsified the statement of the witness, in which it signed the suspect's report as multiple witness statements, and the strange facts and circumstances of the case suggest that the witness was a teacher Was a witness, who withdrew from his first version; because of his maternal influence, because his statement was recorded in his maternal presence. And that too in their house. This would mean that she was completely under the influence of her maternal aunt, the story of poisoning the deceased, it seems to be a peculiar and fabricated story, with no evidence to show the previous tense relationship or verbal recurrence between the victim. Was not brought. The accused himself applied for the post-mortem examination of the victim. If something was black from below, the accused would never have produced the witness's legacy, medical evidence would not help, the prosecutor could not have obtained the facts when the accused. The defendant was denied any other material evidence when he was fugitive. And being subjected to material contradictions, there was no conclusive evidence of the accused's guilt only because of the prosecution's conviction and conviction.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
