ZULIFIQAR ALI versus MINISTRY OF REVENUE GOVERNMENT OF PUNJABLAHORE
Approval of Appointment of Constitutional Petitions 1973 Arts 4, 25, 27 and 199 Constitutional petition Minister was appointed Patwari after advertisement issued in the press Following formal steps by the competent authority, orders for appointment of applicant were issued When he joined his constituency after joining his duties, the authorities instructed the applicant to surrender his appointment letter as it was without the approval of the Minister. Was validated, without any legal law and without any jurisdiction Harty had some intention of removing the applicant from employment, had to comply with the prescribed laws and regulations regarding a person's terms and conditions, and subordinates could not be instructed to send him their appointment. Submit In the present case, according to the law and the authorities were not violated Art 4, 25 and 27 by letter and in which the appointment authority of Patwari was Assistant Commissioner and any authority to appoint another authority. Could not issue a letter seeking approval from him. On any appointment, the High Court rejected the tendency to interfere in all matters of ministers and to seize the powers of other officials so that they could appoint their own workers and the Chief Minister could not issue instructions for the appointment of his public servants. Otherwise, the instructions for handing over the appointment letter were not in accordance with the rules of the provincial government, so issuing such a letter on the direction of the authorized authority was illegal and illegal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
