Find a Lawyer

SARFRAZ versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (iii) / 148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the FIR should immediately specify the specific role of the attackers, including the applicants and their The deadly weapon related to was listed with the statement. While he was taking the complaint at the time of the incident (both the brother of the victim) and the injured witness gave a general statement of the incident and his presence could not be doubted on defense, despite cross-examination, the witness said. Can be in length Do not disturb his testimony Medical evidence was also fully in accordance with the ocular version, both courts considered the prosecution's stand in this case according to the defense story taken by the defendant that contained 20 deadly weapons. The men arrived in front of the accused's house. And resorted to indiscriminate firing, but none of the accused suffered any injury, thus, the story presented by the defense, therefore, did not appeal the argument being unnecessary and impossible. Due to the seizure of individual guns from the applicant, which according to the forensic science laboratory was tied to the evacuation of offenses recovered from the scene of the incident, no justification has been given which the Supreme Court of the High Court Refused to interfere with the rational decision of. Appeal denied in the circumstances registration advocate from Shujabad lawyer