TANVIR HUSSAIN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LIAQUATPUR
Failure to use alternate modes of service against the presiding officer of the Family Court, keeping aside the conditions for the filing of Section 5 and Schedule Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition, stats, registered envelope It came back unsafe with a report that the defendant was out of family court instead of issuing separate service and accused the prosecuting plaintiff of taking care of the plaintiff's claim that the presiding officer and the plaintiff were from the same village. Had a close relationship and that was because Case 13 did not comply with legal requirements Was fixed within the day. The appellate court dismissed the decree with the condition that the unannounced money failed to be submitted to the court, failing which the application for the dismissal of the previous party order will be dismissed. Upon receipt of the report on the envelope, the Family Court did not take any justification for it. On the defendant's earlier decree, the Family Court quickly and unanimously approved it without satisfying its conscience and no court service was served by the High Court. And the method was not adopted. The stipend for deposit is very strict and was deposited in a bond of guarantee equal to the defective amount of the person having the standard financial status, hence the application was allowed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
