Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAQ versus MST. SURRYA BEGUM

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Laws in Martyrdom (10 of 1984), Article 64 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Suit for Declaration of the Son Dies in 1960 That is, A, while his other son M had already guessed that the legacy of S was granted on behalf of the defendants on the basis of the will on 16 2 1961 \ claiming that he was M's son while The defendants were not his daughters, but \ N were the daughters of his mother's ex-husband, so S was not entitled to inherit the entire property of the trial court, finding that the accused M. Up. The Elite Court's daughters have ruled in the case, but in review, the High Court dismissed it. The decree was dismissed and the plaintiff's point was that in view of the defendant's mother's direct evidence, the effect was that she was born with the defendant's previous marriage, it cannot be said. That the defendant was a daughter. Mother of Ms Validity Defendants - The mother certainly had a claim to support the property (her sons) in order to maintain the property in the family so that the defendants' daughters did not participate in it and their husbands did not get it. About which no evidence has been presented. Such direct evidence was passed in favor of his widow and daughters to show that the inheritance of Ann (the defendant's former husband / mother), after his death, was inherited. Is stopped, the mere statement of the defendant's mother. His sons would not be enough to deprive the contestants of their status as M's daughters would inherit M (former son S). advocate from Ranipur lawyer