Find a Lawyer

NADEEM AHMED KHANZADA versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE

Sindh Police (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1988 R 6 (3) (b) (i) Police Rules, 1934, 8 16 32 Servant dismissed from service after issuing show cause notice, but not without In connection with the serious allegations leveled against him by an inquiry, the public servant denied such allegations and made a full inquiry into the authority, but was dismissed and the civil servant was found to be inadvertent. He was sentenced to dismiss for a job and to adopt a shortcut. In a way that was not guaranteed by law, he was dismissed for two charges against a public servant even though it was very serious, but the authority failed to prove through credible evidence if the employee was a government employee. The allegations against them were serious and if the civil servant denied that the investigation could not be withdrawn with regular inquiry and the facts could not be recorded without examining the supporting evidence. The charges, which are not subject to inquiry by law, were set forth with the government employee's dismissal of services by the authority, so that he could be reinstated. us immigration advocates from Tando Allahyar lawyer