Find a Lawyer

JAN MUHAMMAD versus BASHIR AHMAD

Seeking appeals from the original decree of the CPC Act XLI, O XLI, R 19 Appeal for illegal prosecution was dismissed, appeal for re-entry of appeal was dismissed for prosecution. The application for re-entry of the appeal was also excluded on the ground that the appellant had suppressed the material facts and that the appellant and his lawyer's affidavit had properly filed the petitioner's request for re-entry. His request for a draft was excluded by default, clearly his suggestion was That the wrong written history of the appeal hearing due to his lawyer's disqualification was shown to the court. The court rejected the appellant's position before the court, but the appellate court did not appear at that location and instead appealed. Dismissed appellant's request for re-entry of the appeal because of an incorrect draft of And the affidavits attached to it, though it were the first responsibility of a Council, to follow up on its client wholeheartedly and to take all precautions so that his client's interest could not be jeopardized. , But if the wrong date was entered in the diary due to the lawyer's wrongdoing or his clerk's appeal and the appeal or request for the non-prosecutorial appellant / client was dismissed and should not be judged and the appeal restored And it is in the interest of justice to decide on the issue of merits or exclude the application for re-entry by the appellate court. Will be granted, the High Court strongly appeals for the re-entry of the appeal on the merit us immigration advocates from Chaman lawyer