Find a Lawyer

CH. MAHMOOD AKBAR, SUPERINTENDENT JAIL, DISTRICTJAIL, FAISALABAD versus CH. MUHAMMAD AFZAL, SUPERINTENDENT JAIL, SIALKOT

Punjab Civil Servants (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974 R 8 (1) (b), Explaint I Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Sections 7.8 and 9 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Sec. 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) While serving as Deputy Superintendent Prison, Publicity Seniority Respondent was posted as Superintendent Jail on 21 12 1989, on his own salary and scale, and 19 1994 The respondent was claimed to have progressed from acting as superintendent since 21 12 1989, but the Department rejected the appeal of the defendant accepted by the service tribunal representing him. When he was awarded the rank of pay and allowances, privileges and Superintendent's office that the applicant claims 12 to 12, 1989. That he was not party to the appeal because he was senior to the respondent. And that the Tribunal erred in granting the privilege and privilege of the Respondent Superintendent from 21 to 1989, which sought to promote it, saying that from that date, the Supreme Court had considered the petitioners' condemnation. Was allowed to appeal immigration advocates contact from Kakul lawyer