Find a Lawyer

RAHAT SHAH versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 400/401 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Suppression of Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act ( XV of 1975), Section 4 guarantees, no other evidence was available other than the statement of the investigating officer as there was no general evidence on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime, as usually to give evidence against the ordinary accused. The expert did not bother to tell the weapons expert whether the weapon was allegedly recovered. Whether or not the accused were in working condition, there was no evidence available on record to show that the accused was searching for sources for the robbery or arranging for them to be questioned. Whether they were engaged in preparation or engaged in gossip, they would need more. Inquiries whether section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, and section 4 of the Special Provisions to Suppress Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975, apply to a case against anyone. ccused, recording of the evidence will be seen when the bail is granted in the circumstances famous supreme court advocate from Rahwali lawyer