Find a Lawyer

ABDULLAH versus FATEH MUHAMMAD

CPC Appeals Civil Procedure Code Order XLI Original Order O XLI, R 27 Production of certified copy of the document at the appeal stage, which was already filed by the trial court, recording the evidence by the appellate court required by the trial court. Also, at the time of the preparation of the document, the lawyer for the defendants did not have to caveat which was not a certified copy, therefore, a simple copy of the document was allowed to be presented in evidence; at the time of trial, the trial court must As a result. As far as whether the evidence was admissible or not, as well as the defendants' duty to raise their objections to the evidence presented in the preparation of the documents, no one should be harmed by the error of the appellate court. The circumstances, for the sake of justice, were completely permissible in allowing the production of a certified copy of the Power of Attorney and there was no need for recordings merely evidence for the production of a certified copy of the Power of Attorney because its copy It was already presented in evidence and it was exhibited without any objection by the counsel for the defendants that the appellate court's decision was found to be illegal. advocate from Talagang lawyer