Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI versus THE STATE

Sections 302 (6) / 34, 324/34, 353/34, 337 F (ii) and 337 F (iii) were not listed in the FIR nor testimony listed under Section 161, Cr. In the statement, the PC did not confess to any witnesses immediately before the incident, the day before the confession, evidence of the rifle recovery and the pistol did not confirm the ocular testimony because of the firearms. There was no crime free. The FIR, taken on a dark night, did not provide any identifying marks for the accused. During the identification parade, witnesses were assigned a specific role by the witnesses, who was also the victim of other legal weaknesses against the accused. Failed to prove his case, beyond reasonable doubt in the circumstances, the accused were acquitted accordingly. online advocate from Mirpur Khas lawyer