KHURSHID ANWAR versus UNITED BANK LIMITED., BANK SQUARE BRANCH, FAISALABAD THROUGH GENERAL ATTORNEYS
Banking Tribunals Ordinance 1984 Section 6 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Sections 133 and 135 suit guaranteed to increase the interest rate from 1396 to 1496 in terms of guarantee. The personal liability interest rate hike for the company's loans was approved by the lending company at a meeting of its directors, which was held four years before the bank plaintiff filed a lawsuit because a director's meeting I was there and he confirmed the minute. For the meeting, which was sent to the bank plaintiff, at no time did he claim to be excluded from personal liability nor could he now assert that the increase was without his consent. Was done, the defendants cannot be allowed to take advantage of the provisions of section 133. 135 of the Contract Act, 1872, and the liability of the borrower company and the formation of the defendants when the rate of entry was raised as the respondents were increased because it was paid by the borrower company. Was personally responsible for the amount to be made
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Fort Abbas lawyer