MESSRS SHAHEEN PUBLIC EDUCATIONALSOCIETY (REGD.) versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Karachi Development Authority Order 1957 Arts 52 & 52A Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 199 Constitution Allocation of Welfare Plot Allotment of applicant, which was a registered society which was running a school, was allotted an Asset Plot, but The allotment order was later canceled as the required area was not available after which the applicant was allotted another major plot. After the society and the society seized the plot, it started construction and after that the applicant claimed to the authority that the alternative plot was low cost and the applicant should be compensated. If the applicant feels that the plot does not fit his requirement later, he may refuse to accept the allotment and obtain the appropriate plot allotment. But the applicant seized the plot, took up the structures and was running the school there. At the same time, the petitioner moved the Ombudsman for the allotment of extra plot through compensation and the Ombudsman asked the authority to allocate additional plots. However, even after the issuance of the allotment order, the applicant had never bothered to surrender the allotted plot before, and later protested against the reduction in plot size. Looking to seize property property for providing public services, but the constitution of Pakistan Under Article 199, the High Court's equitable and arbitrary jurisdiction (1973) cannot be applied to allow the applicant to do so, because the applicant is already more fidgety
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Diamer lawyer