MIRZA INAYAT BEG versus THE WAPDA
Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Recovery of the amount received during the deduction and promotion of retaining the controversial petition petitioner / Government servant Grade 17 Challenged his mitigation orders from The receipt of the amount received by him during Grade 16 and his promotion, the issue relating to the applicant's termination that relates to the terms and conditions of service, cannot be served in the constitutional petition when the Service Tribunals Act 1973 Can be appealed under Section 4 of the Act. The constitutional application cannot be maintained to the extent that the matter was excluded in connection with the payment of the maximum amount received by the applicant during its development, not related to the terms and conditions of service and An appeal could not be filed before the service. Thus, the Tribunal can entertain the High Court Constitution petition and will decide the same option. Tennis could not recover the amount paid to the applicant in Grade 17 when he served in the department in this grade and in that position. His salary was paid to the applicant for whom he served.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer